Politically incorrect journeys (9): Sweden
This is a travel blog about Malmö, Scandinavia and the failure of multiracialism throughout northern Europe.Taken from the free downloadable book Kebabville & Zone
Employment agency
Eventually, I did get an ordinary Swede to open up, in a
private environment where he did not have to worry about being overheard. He
was a young gardener, doing one of string of short-term jobs he had done since
leaving school.
“Without a good education, all you can do here is work
like this, treeplanting, retail, call centre jobs. Youth unemployment in Malmö
is awful. Of my friends, two out of twenty have jobs. And still we let them in.
They do all the manual jobs we used to do. But you don’t actually need money
when you’re in Sweden if you’re an immigrant ... they give you everything for
free.”
Bitterly he talked, about how easy it was to exploit the
welfare system, how immigrant votes in Rosengård had been bought with cash, how
the government intended to flood the country with thousands of Syrian refugees.
“It’s insane!” He said he had once been asked by a man to help arrange a paper
marriage to get somebody residence papers. Why didn’t he report it?
“What do you think? The police would question him, and he
would deny it. Do you believe our police would seriously investigate it?”
This, I realized, was my first ever cynical, pissed-off
Swede. They hadn’t really existed in the 1980s, as I remembered it—in
landsfadren Palme’s halcyon days of affluence for all, easy-going equality and
well-meaning idealism. We, the British, had cynicism. And the Swedes had lugn,
that unflappable persistence personified by Björn Borg at Wimbledon.
“And if you tell people that you have voted for the
Sweden Democrats,” he went on, “they will call you racist. And so
everybody..”–he said no more, but made a zipping motion, moving his hand across
his mouth. “Everybody thinks the same about this, but nobody dares say
anything. Swedes, you know, do not like to be judged.
“Sorry, I don’t read much. I don’t understand this mång-
mång- stuff (multi- multi- stuff—he couldn’t remember the word “multicultural,”
mångfaldig). I just know it has gone too far. Do you have the same problem in
your country?”
“Yes. Pretty much.”
I asked him if he had thought of emigrating, trying his
luck elsewhere.
“Oh yes, many times. To America or Canada. But I wouldn’t
go unless there was something already fixed up in advance. If I went would they
give me social security as soon as I got there? Like they do here?”
“I doubt it.”
“Ah, well.”
***
“Racist is the worst thing you can be called here. Swedes
are simply afraid to criticise immigration.”
“Why don’t they just vote SD then, and keep quiet about
it?”
“If it came to be known that you voted for the Sweden
Democrats, you would risk being ostracized or sent to Coventry in your
workplace. The immigation issue divides families now.”
In Landet som försvann, Julia Caesar reproduces some
Facebook posts that give an idea of the personal cost of voting for the Sweden
Democrats. They were originally recorded in the well-known Affes
Statistik-blogg after the party entered parliament in 2010:
“One half million people voted for the Sweden Democrats
in the parliamentary election—are you one of them? Defriend me. We will never
meet again.”
“If you voted for the Sweden Democrats, you can defriend
me and go and cut your wrists and stick your head up your backside ... Welcome
to 2010 and not 1925, you damned racist whores.” (The word “damned” here,
jävla, could probably be translated with something stronger.)
“If any of my ‘friends’ here on Facebook are, contrary to
expectation, among the approximately 450,000 Swedes who voted for the Sweden
Democrats, then I ask you cordially but firmly to get lost and go to hell.”
Wailed a Twitter commentator quoted by SVT, “I am ASHAMED
of being Swedish, shit country!” The frothing hate of the tolerant goes all the
way up to the so-called elite. “So this is where we have arrived,” mused a
well-known Expressen writer on election night. “I want to kill somebody.”
I was talking about these things with Ingrid Carlqvist, a
veteran journalist who runs the Dispatch International news website with the
Danish writer Lars Hedegaard. Because of her views, she is a persona non grata
in Sweden’s mainstream media, but also one of the country’s best-known
journalists. My meeting with her, in a downtown bakery café, was the only
formally arranged interview I had during this stay. Her English was superb. And
she wasn’t bothered about being overheard in public.
“When I was first called a racist, it was shocking, but
now I’m used to it, I am confident of my views.
“The political system does not know how to categorise SD.
They are using the smear approach, but people basically know that they are not
real racists, and when you use words like Nazi and Fascist in connection with
them you are kind of stuck when it comes to describing the real extremists.”
“Do most Swedes approve of the government’s immigration
policy?”
“Of course not. But Swedes don’t protest. They don’t go
out on the streets and throw stones and set things on fire. Plus, we have the
most repressive government in Europe now when it comes to criticism of
immigration.” Instead, she said, there had been white flight out of Malmö, “to
places with a low immigrant population, like Vellinge.
“Although Malmö is by far the most multiracial city in
Sweden, many other smaller towns like Eskilstuna have major problems with
immigration… After those riots in Rosengård, the government simply threw money
at the problem, giving the rioters a motive for behaving badly again. That’s
the only response Sweden has to these problems—throw more money at them. Swedes
can’t understand why they happen, because they assume that immigrants will
automatically adopt our ‘superior’ way of life. But of course they won’t,
because their way of life is so very different from ours. Some of the
immigrants, they just laugh at us, they despise us, for constantly giving them
money.”
“And yet a majority of people go on voting for more of
it. Why do you think so many Swedes feel this need to open their country up
like this?”
“One reason is this. In the seventeenth century we had a
great empire. People somehow want to recreate this kind of power. But not
through bad things like war but through .. how do you say it, mänsklighet?”
“Humanitarianism, magnanimity, human kindness ..”
“It’s something inside us. We Swedes are driven to be
number one, the best at everything. Just try googling ‘Sweden is the world’s
best’ in Swedish. We pride ourselves on leading the world in garbage-sorting.
Now contrast that, I mean the Swedish Lutheran tradition of hard work and
taking personal initiative with the fatalism of Islam. The Insha’Allah (God
willing) mentality—that justifies idleness and unemployment. ... Do you realize that there are almost no Swedes today who
know what war is? What will happen if we get involved in another major war? Do
you think our Muslims will be loyal to Sweden?”
“Is it true,” I asked, “that Jews are leaving Malmö?”
“Yes. There has been harassment and a few physical
incidents. And when it emerged that the aggression was not from the ‘Nazis’ but
from the Muslims, the papers did not report that fact. A street near the main
synagogue, Föreningsgata, is locally nicknamed Hatets gata.”
That’s Hate Street, or Hategate: Expressen (far-left
tabloid) writer Micke Ölander did a story on it in 2011, and, sure enough,
somehow failed to mention who was doing the hating in the 37 cases mentioned.
Instead, he discreetly noted near the bottom of the piece that a “dialogue
forum” had been created for representatives of the Jewish, Muslims, Roma and
Somali communities.
Carlqvist was meeting me while on her way to Copenhagen,
where she spends half her time, though “I’d rather be in Skåne.” Her partner in
running Dispatch International, Lars Hedegaard, has been forced to use a safe
house since an attempt on his life in February 2013, when a gunman posing as a
parcel delivery man tried to shoot him.
“Yes, I miss Skåne,” she said. “When I was a child, my
parents would spontaneously talk to people on the bus, to my embarrassment. But
now nobody does that any more. It’s not indifference. It’s fear. Because now
people do not feel safe anymore.” I thought of my last bus ride.
No comments:
Post a Comment